Between Dependence and Autonomy: Students' Reflections on AI Use in English Language Learning

Main Article Content

Andi Fuada
Indri Feybe Barauntu
Nuraeni

Abstract

Purpose


This study explored how English Education students use artificial intelligence (AI) in English language learning and how they negotiate the relationship between AI use and learner autonomy.


 


Method


The study employed a qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine students who regularly used AI tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, and translation applications in academic writing activities. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.


 


Key Finding


The findings revealed that participants perceived AI as a mediational and supportive tool rather than a replacement for human thinking. AI was primarily used to improve language accuracy, generate ideas, organize writing, and complete academic tasks more efficiently. However, participants also expressed awareness of the potential risks of excessive AI dependence, particularly regarding critical thinking, deep learning, and independent cognitive engagement. To maintain learner autonomy, students actively regulated their AI use by cross-checking AI-generated responses, limiting dependence on AI, and maintaining ownership of their ideas and writing voice. The study further found that learner autonomy in AI-assisted learning was understood not as the absence of technological support, but as the ability to critically evaluate, manage, and control AI use responsibly.


 


Implication


These findings suggest that AI does not necessarily reduce learner autonomy when learners engage with it reflectively and critically. Therefore, educators should guide students toward responsible and reflective AI literacy while encouraging independent thinking and cognitive engagement in language learning.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fuada, A., Barauntu, I. F., & Nuraeni. (2026). Between Dependence and Autonomy: Students’ Reflections on AI Use in English Language Learning. Journal of Language Learning and Assessment, 4(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.71194/jlla.v4i1.148
Section
Articles

References

Ai, H. (2015). Providing graduated corrective feedback in an intelligent computer-assisted language learning environment. ReCALL, 27(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401500012X

Alm, A. (2024). Exploring autonomy in the AI wilderness: Learner challenges and choices. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1–15.

Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Dilthey, W. (2002). The formation of the historical world in the human sciences (R. A. Makkreel & F. Rodi, Eds.). Princeton University Press.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2014). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Bloomsbury Academic. (Original work published 1960)

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon.

Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868

Laguna, L. (2023). Self-regulated learning in AI-assisted educational environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1567–1584.

Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Authentik.

Pham, L., & Huong, H. (2025). EFL students’ agency in self-study of English language with AI-powered learning applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(7), 68–89.

Sari, A., Rachmajanti, S., & Anugerahwati, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in English language learning: Opportunities and challenges for autonomous learning. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 11(2), 405–427.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences (E. A. Shils & H. A. Finch, Trans.). Free Press.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zhen, X. (2025). Application of artificial intelligence in English learning: The interactive effects of teacher support, learning motivation, and autonomous learning ability. Acta Psychologica, 261, Article 105006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105006